Plos Decision In Process

Arguably one of the most promising as well as critical applications of deep learning is in supporting medical sciences and decision making. All PLOS journals practice single-blind peer review as a baseline. Included in the letter was a note that development on PLOS' ambitious workflow system, Aperta, was being shut down. collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. As a general rule, Academic Editors must be at Principle Investigator level or above and have published 25 or more peer-reviewed journal articles. It also can lead to cases like mine, which PLOS even admitted was completely unacceptable. The decision probably depends on whether or not we believe it will be a hot day (event A). How does the brain process visual images? What social cognitive mechanisms are affected in dementia patients? Which neural networks are involved in making everyday decisions? Cognitive neuroscience is an interdisciplinary field spanning a wide range of areas from behavioral neuroscience to cognitive psychology to neuroimaging. DefinitionBranch of law governing the creation and operation of administrative agencies. -Palestinian relations and. For a journal like PLOS ONE, even small production improvements are desirable if they shorten the publication process or reduce the interventions of humans. 好啊,我的先大修,再小修,小修主要修语气,提交后现在第2天,状态是Decision in Process,指点一下是什么情况,从此状态到接受要多长时间?. Took two weeks for the hiring manager to get in touch, once asked for an interview I let them know that I was on a family trip and would not be able to interview until the following week. Any increase in the pool of talent for these roles is likely to sharpen the peer review process at PLoS ONE. Most recently Kent Andersen has written a piece on Scholarly Kitchen that contains a number of fairly serious misconceptions about the processes of PLoS ONE. What is InVEST? InVEST is a suite of free, open-source software models used to map and value the goods and services from nature that sustain and fulfill human life. I have seen comments stating that the Plos One editorial process is quite slow, but while it did take a while for us to publish, it had more to do with addressing the reviewers comments than the editorial process itself. 9% of the justices’ 240,000 votes, the authors report in PLOS ONE. 5 Stages of consumer buying decision process The marketer is responsible for selling the goods in the market so he must have the knowledge how the consumers actually make their buying decisions. Our work not only sheds light on the evolution of intelligence in natural animals, but will also accelerate attempts to create artificial intelligence (AI). com to make a rational decision or just choose the outfit we like the best regardless of the weather, but suppose all we have at our disposal is memory of the temperatures last summer (event B). Most recently Kent Andersen has written a piece on Scholarly Kitchen that contains a number of fairly serious misconceptions about the processes of PLoS ONE. PLOS ONE is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. While I cannot guarantee that your appeal will be approved by our in house editors, they will consider appeals via the formal appeals process when you submit a detailed rebuttal. How long will the review process take? A: Our authors often ask us how long it will take before they receive an initial decision on their submission to PLoS ONE and we appreciate that having worked on the research for months or years, authors are often anxious to receive news of the suitability of. This video guides peer reviewers through the process of reviewing a scientific manuscript from start to finish. Data collection. decision not to recertify the office of the PLO, the main Palestinian negotiating body, later this month was an "unprecedented step" in the history of U. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Remember that the editors may not be experts in the field. Each author should have made real and concrete contributions. You will receivevthe decision next time the managing editor login to the editorial system. 9% of the justices' 240,000 votes, the authors report in PLOS ONE. A decision is a choice made between 2 or more available alternatives. RESEARCH ARTICLE Population need for primary eye care in Rwanda: A national survey Tess Bright1,2*, Hannah Kuper1,2, David Macleod3, David Musendo2,4, Peter Irunga4, Jennifer L. PHYSICAL SCIENCE EXPANSION Find a home for your Physical Sciences and Engineering research in PLOS ONE. We leverage this variation to model how editorial bias in the manuscript decision process relates to social factors, in particular peer assessment and editor citation remuneration (an analogue to self-citation), which we find to be strongest among the extremely-active editors. We wouldn't want to leave something as important as student learning and success to guesswork. The authors of the best papers (as judged by the GLBIO Program Committee) will be interviewed about their work for a PLOS Collections blog. (At PLoS Medicine, in house editors are joined in this decision-making process by academic editors—generally members of our editorial board, but sometimes other academics—who advise us throughout the peer-review process. It is a tax-exempt, 501(c)3, nonprofit corporation headquartered in San Francisco, California. Using reference management software. The collaborative outcome is the development of integrative solutions that go beyond an individual's vision to a productive resolution that could not be accomplished by any single person or organization. The manuscript was submitted in August, after queries, the journal staff assured that the manuscript was going out for peer review, then after a month and a half, the manuscript was rejected within a day of being viewed by a subject. Read this article to understand peer review and editorial decision-making process in detail. The review process was smooth and fast, and the editorial staff is very helpful during the production phase (they added in text for me, etc. Evaluation of the dietary intake data coding process in a clinical setting: Implications for research practice. Advisors and Academic Editors at PeerJ are experienced researchers who are experts in their respective fields. ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work. Click to expand +1 on the time, PLoS one will take at least 2 months to get your review back. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Papers submitted to PLOS ONE and under consideration for the Neuroscience of Reward and Decision Making Collection will be handled by selected active researchers from our Editorial Board, and in most cases by one of the PLOS ONE Handling Editors listed above. In November 2010 we collected identifiers for all 24,331 articles published to date in the seven journals of open-access publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS) and gathered a set of approximately 1. I had read bad reviews of PLOS on Glassdoor before accepting the jobs, and I should have listened to them. Watch here, or follow along in the transcript below. PLOS ONE publishes original research in all scientific disciplines, including interdisciplinary research, negative results and replication studies. The company is poorly managed and treats employers with disrespect. PLoS ONE entered the market claiming fast publication times, but data show that PLoS ONE is slowing down, with times more than doubling over the past few years. Once again, PLOS Medicine and, to a lesser extent, PLOS Biology are estimated to have a substantially higher proportion of articles with which the community have engaged on an academic level. 2013-12-13 小修后decision in process什么意思 2016-11-24 plos one怎样和外国编辑解释消除回车键的步骤 2015-07-08 plosone大修返回后decison in process. Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. What I have come to appreciate about the PLoS ONE Academic Editor* system is that it is opt-in. Our emphasis is on studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into a biological process or processes. From 1816 until 2015, the algorithm correctly predicted 70. Perhaps unsurprisingly, my tweet attracted some pushback from OA advocates, not least from Michael Eisen , co-founder of open access publisher Public. Too often a journal's decision to publish a paper is dominated by subjective criteria, which can be frustrating and delay the publication of your work. 9% of the justices' 240,000 votes, the authors report in PLOS ONE. A first decision of 30 -35 days at PLOS ONE should not include any desk rejected papers because PLOS ONE's mantra is that importance/impact/sexiness does not matter - all that matters is whether or not the methodology is sound. 2), June 2016 > Towards best practice in physical and physiological employment standar. From 1816 until 2015, the algorithm correctly predicted 70. PLOS Pathogens is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. com to make a rational decision or just choose the outfit we like the best regardless of the weather, but suppose all we have at our disposal is memory of the temperatures last summer (event B). -Palestinian relations and. Download with Google Download with Facebook. The results. Here are instructions for enabling JavaScript in your web browser. Science Is Suffering Because of Peer Review’s Big Problems How to reform the journal publication process. Arguably one of the most promising as well as critical applications of deep learning is in supporting medical sciences and decision making. Exposure to media content (e. The manuscript was submitted in August, after queries, the journal staff assured that the manuscript was going out for peer review, then after a month and a half, the manuscript was rejected within a day of being viewed by a subject editor. Plos One Author Instructions. Laurie Pencille. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Publishing Process. 2017-8-15 decision in process PLOS PATHO IF虽然不错, 可惜杂志里面的几个专业编审只认自己的小圈子, 还是关系户比较容易, 做. The authors of the best papers (as judged by the GLBIO Program Committee) will be interviewed about their work for a PLOS Collections blog. That bests the popular. This model provides a structure and promotes transparency of the decision-making process, which allows for a comprehensive. Turing machine, universal computation, decision problem Machine's state is controlled by a program, while data for program is on limitless external tape every machine can be described as a numberthat can be. We are making major strides towards a more open. Interview candidates say the interview experience difficulty for PLOS is average. Please read these Rules before applying for an award from the Accelerating Science Award Program (“Program”). txt) or read online for free. Any increase in the pool of talent for these roles is likely to sharpen the peer review process at PLoS ONE. PLOS ONE considers original research articles from all disciplines within the natural sciences, medical research, engineering, as well as the related social sciences and humanities. How long for a decision? Economist 01c3. PLoS ONE, 2012. PLOS (Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization with a mission of leading a transformation in scientific and medical research communication. The Impact Factor 2018 of PLoS Computational Biology is 4. Q: I have just submitted a manuscript to PLoS ONE. 当前位置: 首页 > 论文投稿 > plos one 直接从under review 到了Decision in Process 什么意思 plos one 直接从under review 到了Decision in Process 什么意思 作者 yucheng9255. Arguably one of the most promising as well as critical applications of deep learning is in supporting medical sciences and decision making. Help the journal editors make their decision; Journal editors make their decisions based on the journal’s publication criteria, read these before you start your review. Scientific Literature Digital Library incorporating autonomous citation indexing, awareness and tracking, citation context, related document retrieval, similar document identification, citation graph analysis, and query-sensitive document summaries. The latest Tweets from PLOS (@PLOS). Join the many publishers that have committed to requiring ORCID iDs in the publishing process for their journal(s)! In November, 2015, a group of publishers asked ORCID to help facilitate communications about their plans to require authors to use an ORCID iD, including hosting this open letter explaining their rationale, developing best. While the changes PLOS ONE proposed are intended to shorten the acceptance-to-publication period, it will have no affect on the period from submission-t0-acceptance. Q&A with PLOS co-founder Michael Eisen Last month I suggested on Twitter that the open access movement has delayed the revolution in scholarly communication that the internet made possible. Hi reddit! We study the evolution of intelligence by conducting experiments in computational simulations of evolution. Turing machine, universal computation, decision problem Machine’s state is controlled by a program, while data for program is on limitless external tape every machine can be described as a numberthat can be. across several brain regions, some of which are known to be involved in auditory process-ing, while others are regarded as keyplayers in emotional and autonomic control. Revise : The authors are asked to make a few changes to the manuscript, based on reviewer comments. If required, the editor may consult the editorial board at this stage. Evaluation of the dietary intake data coding process in a clinical setting: Implications for research practice. August 12, 2019 [ MEDLINE Abstract]. One problem I've had with PLoS CB is they send the paper to experimental biologists (great) but don't weigh the comments of the reviewers in relation with their expertise and field. From 1816 until 2015, the algorithm correctly predicted 70. August 12, 2019 [ MEDLINE Abstract] Nuclear corepressor SMRT is a strong regulator of body weight independently of its ability to regulate thyroid hormone action. This video guides peer reviewers through the process of reviewing a scientific manuscript from start to finish. How to reform the journal publication process. Some recently asked PLOS interview questions were, "Why do you want to work for this publisher/journal. PLoS Computational Biology, 2010, 6(3): e1000707. Many insects sequester nutrients during developmentally programmed periods, which they metabolize during subsequent life history stages. However, in a comment on a PLOS One blog post in 2009, the then Publisher Pete Binfield stated that "of the 1,520 papers which received a first decision in the second quarter of 2009 (April - June), the mean time from QC completion to first decision was 33. Conflicts were resolved by consensus. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * E-mail: [email protected] In November 2010 we collected identifiers for all 24,331 articles published to date in the seven journals of open-access publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS) and gathered a set of approximately 1. PLoS ONE entered the market claiming fast publication times, but data show that PLoS ONE is slowing down, with times more than doubling over the past few years. The entire. PHYSICAL SCIENCE EXPANSION Find a home for your Physical Sciences and Engineering research in PLOS ONE. These findings thus allow us to speculate on how continuous exposure to (sub-)liminal IS could. 161 of the two approaches is added. The Editor will contact you directly with the editorial decision, Editor comments, and reviewer comments. That bests the popular. Of special importance are the powers granted to administrative agencies, the substantive rules that such agencies make, and the legal relationships between such agencies, other government bodies, and the public at large. Any increase in the pool of talent for these roles is likely to sharpen the peer review process at PLoS ONE. ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work. As Associate Editor you will work with other editors to oversee the editorial process for submissions to PLOS ONE. They need you because of your specialized knowledge and technical expertise. IPDAS Versions & Use. DefinitionBranch of law governing the creation and operation of administrative agencies. Took two weeks for the hiring manager to get in touch, once asked for an interview I let them know that I was on a family trip and would not be able to interview until the following week. Despite maintaining their forests for centuries, indigenous peoples and their way of life are often side-lined in discussions regarding conservation efforts, as well as the decision-making process. ” To quote from the Elsevier site: “If the Editor has registered a decision in the system but has not yet sent you the email confirming the decision, the status of your article will be listed as ‘Decision in Process’. We like science to be out in the open, and publication of peer-reviewed research to take place without undue delays, so that others can use and build upon the findings. So you might end up with a "submitted" manuscript at a lower impact journal. This is a short guide how to format citations and the bibliography in a manuscript for PLOS ONE. analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Can't sign in? Forgot your password? Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions. Objectives To explore the effectiveness of data sharing by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in journals with a full data sharing policy and to describe potential difficulties encountered in the process of performing reanalyses of the primary outcomes. The whole process was a farce, and ultimately, it confirmed to me that PLOS actually have no control over the editorial process at PLOS ONE, which leads to completely different standards being applied by different editors and reviewers. The paper came back from the first round of review with a decision of major revisions, and we sent it back after addressing most of the reviewer concerns. Several features of this site will not function whilst javascript is disabled. Spotlight: Neuroscience of Reward and Decision Making PLOS ONE and PLOS Biology invite you to submit your work on the neural basis of reward and decision making, including research in both human and animal subjects. This video shows PLOS ONE Editorial Board Members how to submit a decision on a manuscript in the Editorial Manager (EM) submission system. Advisors and Academic Editors at PeerJ are experienced researchers who are experts in their respective fields. Laurie Pencille. It is now out and it is ~3. The Peer Review History of a research article is an account of the changes that article underwent during the peer review and revision process at a PLOS journal. I have seen comments stating that the Plos One editorial process is quite slow, but while it did take a while for us to publish, it had more to do with addressing the reviewers comments than the editorial process itself. The comments were quite helpful, and the manuscript was greatly improved because of them. Plos One Author Instructions PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide These are step-by-step instructions for submitting a manuscript to our online submission system. The entire. Of the 255 journals that rendered decisions, 157 accepted the paper, most with no discernible sign of having actually carried out peer review. Arguably one of the most promising as well as critical applications of deep learning is in supporting medical sciences and decision making. PLOS (Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization with a mission of leading a transformation in scientific and medical research communication. 9% of the justices' 240,000 votes, the authors report in PLOS ONE. Some recently asked PLOS interview questions were, "Why do you want to work for this publisher/journal. These findings thus allow us to speculate on how continuous exposure to (sub-)liminal IS could. We can talk as much as we want about the slow review process but at the end of the day, the true problem is that academics have to keep up the numbers (number of papers and citations), which is a. 8 million altmetrics events, defined as a specific action on a specific article. What I have come to appreciate about the PLoS ONE Academic Editor* system is that it is opt-in. Compared with historical Impact Factor data, the Impact Factor 2018 of PLoS Computational Biology grew by 11. The 'virtual' slime mold appeared to be more adept at optimizing this path when it used a 'noisy' decision-making process that maximized long-term benefit, instead of attempting to make a separate decision for each flash of light. PLOS ONE is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. A valid consenting process, leading to an informed consent, is a cornerstone of this aspect necessary for preservation and maintenance of respect for autonomy and dignity. August 12, 2019 [ MEDLINE Abstract]. The paper came back from the first round of review with a decision of major revisions, and we sent it back after addressing most of the reviewer concerns. PLoS ONE couples efficient and objective peer review with a streamlined electronic production workflow. PLoS ONE 5 , e12776 (2010). This video shows PLOS ONE Editorial Board Members how to submit a decision on a manuscript in the Editorial Manager (EM) submission system. (At PLoS Medicine, in house editors are joined in this decision-making process by academic editors—generally members of our editorial board, but sometimes other academics—who advise us throughout the peer-review process. I had read bad reviews of PLOS on Glassdoor before accepting the jobs, and I should have listened to them. Watch here, or follow along in the transcript below. These gliadin peptide sequences from the gliadin peptides library were all synthe- sized using a proprietary combinatorial photolithographic process which was explained in Fig 2 as described above. We wouldn't want to leave something as important as student learning and success to guesswork. So you might end up with a "submitted" manuscript at a lower impact journal. Watch here, or follow along in the transcript below. PLOS (Public Library of Science) is a nonprofit publisher and advocacy organization with a mission of leading a transformation in scientific and medical research communication. A PLOS Medicine article aims to simplify the decision by comparing…. In the end, I am very happy with our decision to publish in PLoS ONE. As Associate Editor you will work with other editors to oversee the editorial process for submissions to PLOS ONE. "Reviewers are essential to the integrity and quality of the peer review process," says PLOS ONE Editor-in-Chief Joerg Heber. The Editor will contact you directly with the editorial decision, Editor comments, and reviewer comments. PLoS ONE features reports of primary research from all disciplines within science and medicine. It also can lead to cases like mine, which PLOS even admitted was completely unacceptable. Laurie Pencille. A word of caution though, even at PLoSOne the review process will probably take longer than three months. My PLoS-ONE Academic Editor Activity Summary By Iddo on July 18th, 2014. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. PLOS ONE is a large and complex journal, so we are constantly striving to ensure that publishing in PLOS ONE is a smooth process that provides a great service to all our authors and readers, and we are presently working on improving our internal workflows. Environmental Working Group's investigation of more than 2,000 cleaning supplies on the American market has found that many contain substances linked to serious health problems. You may assume, Dear Reader, that I would not be posting about this if it were the first time I had heard of such a thing. Emphasizing the importance of participation in decision making process motivates the service provider and the health care team to promote participation of patients in treatment decision making. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Based on recent trends, outbreaks of measles and other vaccine-preventable diseases could be more commonplace in the coming years, even in countries where such diseases have been considered eliminated or under control. The offices are nice and open and there are opportunities to socialise and relax such as weekly Friday events with food and drink, and monthly breakfasts. These findings thus allow us to speculate on how continuous exposure to (sub-)liminal IS could. Dan Xie, Jun Cai, Na-Yu Chia, Huck H. Types of Evidence and How They Are Used in Policy. Updated June 2013 - Many of you reach this page searching for the impact factor of Scientific Reports. There has been an awful lot recently written and said about author-pays business models for scholarly publishing and a lot of it has focussed on PLoS ONE. The review process was smooth and fast, and the editorial staff is very helpful during the production phase (they added in text for me, etc. All PLOS journals practice single-blind peer review as a baseline. Using reference management software. The resulting model illustrates T cell lineage decisions. "Decision in Process" at PLOS A manuscript from my lab is under consideration at a PLOS journal that is one of the top journals in my field. There has been a call for medical education leaders to devote resources to bolster the next generation of. Thus, decision making and learning are closely intertwined. A valid consenting process, leading to an informed consent, is a cornerstone of this aspect necessary for preservation and maintenance of respect for autonomy and dignity. A first decision of 30 -35 days at PLOS ONE should not include any desk rejected papers because PLOS ONE's mantra is that importance/impact/sexiness does not matter - all that matters is whether or not the methodology is sound. Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Sexually Transmitted Infections A WHO-sponsored Collection in PLOS Medicine. Q: I have just submitted a manuscript to PLoS ONE. How long will the review process take? A: Our authors often ask us how long it will take before they receive an initial decision on their submission to PLoS ONE and we appreciate that having worked on the research for months or years, authors are often anxious to receive news of the suitability of. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. After this, acceptance followed without a new round of peer review. Scientific Literature Digital Library incorporating autonomous citation indexing, awareness and tracking, citation context, related document retrieval, similar document identification, citation graph analysis, and query-sensitive document summaries. For a journal like PLOS ONE, even small production improvements are desirable if they shorten the publication process or reduce the interventions of humans. The peer review process for journal publication is essentially a quality control mechanism. My PLoS-ONE Academic Editor Activity Summary By Iddo on July 18th, 2014. Easy 1-Click Apply (THE PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE (PLOS)) Managing Editor, Community Journals job in San Francisco, CA. Decision in process status comes into the picture when the final decision is taken by the chief editor/editor in chief. Diagnostic tests are imperfect, and it can be difficult for clinicians to weigh up their pros and cons to decide which to use. Turing machine, universal computation, decision problem Machine's state is controlled by a program, while data for program is on limitless external tape every machine can be described as a numberthat can be. Hopefully today but it may also take two weeks. The results. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs). Based on recent trends, outbreaks of measles and other vaccine-preventable diseases could be more commonplace in the coming years, even in countries where such diseases have been considered eliminated or under control. The collaborative outcome is the development of integrative solutions that go beyond an individual's vision to a productive resolution that could not be accomplished by any single person or organization. Dan Xie, Jun Cai, Na-Yu Chia, Huck H. The company is poorly managed and treats employers with disrespect. Incomplete Submissions: If you do not enter all of the relevant information in the submission process, your. The amino acid sequences of α, β, γ, and O gliadin used for this process are shown in S1 Table. He said a U. PLOS Pathogens is a peer reviewed scientific journal with a rigorous editorial screening and assessment process made up of several stages. For manuscripts that are peer reviewed externally, the average duration between submission and first decision has been just over 30 days. There is evidence that direct journal endorsement of reporting guidelines can lead to important improvements in the quality and reliability of the published research. They do not need you to be a copy editor. In the end, I am very happy with our decision to publish in PLoS ONE. That’s a good thing: for one, I’m terrible at keeping track of all my service activities, and this helps in keeping them straight for my own annual activities. The emphasis is on studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into a biological process or processes. Mario is an Associate Professor and Head of Division at the Division of Structural Engineering, he works in the research group Concrete Structures at Chalmers. It launched its first journal, PLOS Biology, in October 2003 and publishes seven journals, as of October 2015. We wouldn't want to leave something as important as student learning and success to guesswork. PLoS Computational Biology, 2010, 6(3): e1000707. BackgroundBurnout and depression throughout physicians’ career cycles have been increasing. We can talk as much as we want about the slow review process but at the end of the day, the true problem is that academics have to keep up the numbers (number of papers and citations), which is a. There are quite a number of points to address, but we must not fall into the trap of taking another year to do so. In the end, I am very happy with our decision to publish in PLoS ONE. In the case I describe here, all three reviewers were electrophysiologists, and the decision of interest for the computational community was made by one of them. It is time to develop methods for systematically. All PLOS journals practice single-blind peer review as a baseline. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. The decision probably depends on whether or not we believe it will be a hot day (event A). Most recently Kent Andersen has written a piece on Scholarly Kitchen that contains a number of fairly serious misconceptions about the processes of PLoS ONE. We find that while overall commenting rates are low, and have declined since 2010, there is substantial variation across different. Dan Xie, Jun Cai, Na-Yu Chia, Huck H. Can't sign in? Forgot your password? Enter your email address below and we will send you the reset instructions. Evaluation of the dietary intake data coding process in a clinical setting: Implications for research practice. The question is still open as to whether it is the right venue for my paper, but since March 6 it has received 409 unique views. The collaborative outcome is the development of integrative solutions that go beyond an individual's vision to a productive resolution that could not be accomplished by any single person or organization. I object to this use of the scientific literature to market such a device. Our emphasis is on studies of broad interest that provide significant insight into a biological process or processes. " and "What attracted you to Plos-one and why did you apply ? ". Elsevier - Decision in Process. 2013-3-27 23:00 Decision in Process 状态期待中. PLOS Medicine (formerly styled PLoS Medicine) is a peer-reviewed weekly medical journal covering the full spectrum of the medical sciences. How to format your references using the PLOS ONE citation style. After receipt of the reviewers’ comments, the Associate Editor makes a decision, often after consultation with other editorial board members. Hi reddit! We study the evolution of intelligence by conducting experiments in computational simulations of evolution. These efforts include enhancement of patient access to multifaceted information providing systems and tools that help patients in decision making (9, 10). Wong, Sheng Zhong. The claim is based solely on the decision to value the free care provided by family and friends as if it were compensated at the level of a well-paid health care worker. The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. Ioana Visan was the primary editor on this article and managed its editorial process and peer review. * E-mail: [email protected] Curated by experts, PLOS Channels highlight the latest research from across the published literature, preprints, commentary and news of interest to a community. PLoS Computational Biology, 2010, 6(3): e1000707. Authors are encouraged to use their own voice and to. The latest Tweets from PLOS (@PLOS). We find that while overall commenting rates are low, and have declined since 2010, there is substantial variation across different. To answer your question, publishing in PLOS ONE is not career suicide. Editors are vetted before being appointed, and their decisions are overseen for consistency. ) As authors know to their frustration, on occasion a single review in one direction can weigh more heavily than two or. DefinitionBranch of law governing the creation and operation of administrative agencies. The claim is based solely on the decision to value the free care provided by family and friends as if it were compensated at the level of a well-paid health care worker. 2013-12-13 小修后decision in process什么意思 2016-11-24 plos one怎样和外国编辑解释消除回车键的步骤 2015-07-08 plosone大修返回后decison in process. analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. How to reform the journal publication process. I recently received an email from PLoS-ONE summarizing my editorial activity for the first half of 2014. PHYSICAL SCIENCE EXPANSION Find a home for your Physical Sciences and Engineering research in PLOS ONE. Easy 1-Click Apply (THE PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE (PLOS)) Managing Editor, Community Journals job in San Francisco, CA. Science Is Suffering Because of Peer Review's Big Problems How to reform the journal publication process. Diagnostic tests are imperfect, and it can be difficult for clinicians to weigh up their pros and cons to decide which to use. Related Articles. They need you because of your specialized knowledge and technical expertise. After this, acceptance followed without a new round of peer review. If the process only started on the 23rd of December, and considering the holiday period, I would say that it's maybe too early to get a review. com to make a rational decision or just choose the outfit we like the best regardless of the weather, but suppose all we have at our disposal is memory of the temperatures last summer (event B). While the changes PLOS ONE proposed are intended to shorten the acceptance-to-publication period, it will have no affect on the period from submission-t0-acceptance. @PLOS I think you need to review your process & policy as well as this particular How such an unprofessional editorial decision could be made by PLoS requires review. Our motivation comes from the nervous system, where neurons process multidimensional signals into a binary sequence of responses (spikes). And it was our decision back in 2000 when we were planning PLOS that the only way to do this was to treat the act of publishing as a service provided to universities and funding agencies, with the expectation that they would pay for the service we are providing (note that even for the most expensive PLOS journals,. This video guides peer reviewers through the process of reviewing a scientific manuscript from start to finish. PLOS GENETICS reflects the full breadth and interdisciplinary nature of genetic and genomic research by publishing outstanding original contributions in all areas of biology. It is a tax-exempt, 501(c)3, nonprofit corporation headquartered in San Francisco, California. A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis approach for public school site selection in Surabaya, Indonesia. The process took 3 weeks. The critical difference, and the thing that makes PLoS ONE potentially revolutionary, is that the editors and peer reviewers make no judgment as to the potential impact of the work. PLOS Genetics publishes outstanding original contributions in all areas of biology covering human studies, as well as research on model organisms—from mice and flies, to plants and bacteria. Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials Javascript is currently disabled in your browser. Arguably one of the most promising as well as critical applications of deep learning is in supporting medical sciences and decision making. Infomercial in PLOS One links to website selling unproven treatments for fibromyalgia and dementia. In order to truly understand emotions, it is important to understand the three critical components of an emotion. The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The results. Public Library of Science, PLoS One; Website providing free online access to lectures on machine learning, computer science, and other fields. Plos One Author Instructions. Both problem solving and decision making are concerned with the ways in which people interpret problems, form goals, search information, and combine information to arrive at solutions. Advisors and Academic Editors at PeerJ are experienced researchers who are experts in their respective fields. com is the home page of the Pensacola News Journal with in-depth local news, sports, entertainment, community news, opinion and classifieds. – Calls for Papers for a shared PLOS Collection – Humans and other animals must make decisions in order to survive. Yes, it is lower than PLOS ONE's so you have yet another reason not to publish there. The resulting model illustrates T cell lineage decisions. Competing interests: Professor Kamitani's relationship with ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratories does not alter our adherence to PLOS. Acid Base, Electrolytes, Fluids; Allergy; Allergy and Clinical Immunology; Anesthesiology; Anticoagulation; Art of the JAMA Network; Bleeding and Transfusion. * E-mail: [email protected] Channels are not limited to traditional journal articles, including preprints, AV content, news, conferences and grey literature. If required, the editor may consult the editorial board at this stage. The Peer Review History of a research article is an account of the changes that article underwent during the peer review and revision process at a PLOS journal. Papers submitted to PLOS ONE and under consideration for the Neuroscience of Reward and Decision Making Collection will be handled by selected active researchers from our Editorial Board, and in most cases by one of the PLOS ONE Handling Editors listed above.